Quantcast
Channel: Recent Intellectual Property Law posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 57903

Defendant’s $6.8 Million Fee Request Not “Obviously Excessive” In Light of Plaintiff’s Settlement Demand

$
0
0
The special master recommended reducing the amount of attorneys' fees defendant requested under 35 U.S.C § 285, but rejected plaintiff's argument that a $6.8 million fee request was inherently unreasonable. "[T]he AIPLA Survey lists the average cost of a patent defense may run as high as $5,500,000.00 to $6,000,000.00 for a claim which might result in damages in excess of $25,000,000.00. In determining the amount involved, [plaintiff] self-servingly attempted to value the case somewhere between $1,000,000.00 and $10,000,000.00. However . . . [plaintiff] demanded a settlement 2 months before trial of $18,300,000.00 upfront and $25,000,000.00 per drug candidate approved for market. . . . [Defendant] was justified in thinking it was facing an exposure in excess of $25,000,000.00 and therefore the AIPLA survey supports a finding the request for counsel fees was not obviously excessive." Alzheimer's Institute of America, Inc. v. Avid…

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 57903

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>