Quantcast
Channel: Recent Intellectual Property Law posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 57949

Joint trademark “ownership”: Tea for two?

$
0
0
Yogi tea trademark. It’s been almost ten years ago since the March 2006 blog post, which got a bit of play as it turned out, in which I expressed a sentiment that seemed incomprehensible to me at the time and a decade later I will admit I understand all too well:  The idea that both Marvel and DC could, as they were, both claim to be own the putative trademark SUPER-HERO. I wrote this: DC and Marvel — the only two companies that financially could fight over this with the other of them — are “jointly” claiming rights in the term SUPER-HERO. Adding ™ to super-hero is a naked bid to steal “super-hero” from us and claim it for their own. . . . ,” continues [Boing Boing], concluding: Here’s a proposal: from now on, let’s never use the term “super-hero” to describe a Marvel character. Let’s call them “underwear perverts” — as Warren Ellis is wont to — or…

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 57949

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>