By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in HSM Portfolio LLC, et al. v. Elpida Memory Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-770-RGA (D.Del., February 11, 2016), the Court, among other things, granted Defendant’s motion to strike (D.I. 1049) with respect to the new infringement theory for the ‘949 patent raised in Plaintiffs Expert’s Reply Infringement Report. In its motion to strike, Defendant contended that, in Plaintiffs Expert’s Initial Infringement Report, Plaintiffs only “accused Micron’s 6T SRAM memory cells of infringing the ‘949 patent, and not a ‘sense amplifier’ that would sense the output from those memory cells.” Id. at *5. Defendant then contended that, in Plaintiffs Expert’s Reply Infringement Report, “Plaintiffs accused an entirely new circuit – a ‘sense amplifier.’” Id. Plaintiffs responded by stating that their expert and…
↧