District court finding of indefiniteness reversed by CAFC in ULTIMATEPOINTER

The outcome:UltimatePointer, LLC (“UltimatePointer”) appealsfrom a final judgment in favor of Nintendo Co., Ltd. andNintendo of America, Inc. (collectively, “Nintendo”) afterthe district court granted summary judgment (1) thatNintendo did not infringe claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 12 ofUltimatePointer’s U.S. Patent 8,049,729 (the “’729 patent”),UltimatePointer, LLC v. Nintendo Co, No. 2:14-cv-00865-RSL, 2014 WL 7340604, at *1–2 (W.D. Wash. Dec.22, 2014) (“Infringement Opinion”); and (2) that claims 1,3, 5, and 6 of the ’729 patent are invalid as indefinite,UltimatePointer, LLC v. Nintendo Co., 73 F. Supp. 3d1305, 1308–09 (W.D. Wash. 2014) (“Indefiniteness Opinion”).For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgmentof noninfringement and reverse the determination ofindefiniteness.As to indefiniteness, Teva is not cited for evidentiary standards,but Nautilus is cited:We review a district…